News Today: Legal Officers Defend Attorney General
The Legal Officers’ Association of the Attorney General’s Department has firmly declared its commitment to defending the Attorney General (AG) against any attempts to remove him from office, emphasizing the independence and integrity of the department’s decision-making process.
The statement comes in response to recent controversy surrounding the decision to discharge three suspects in a legal case. The Association asserts that the Attorney General and involved officials have exercised independent professional judgment in accordance with the long-standing traditions of the department.
Legal Officers’ Association Stands Firm Against AG’s Removal
✅ Defending the AG’s professional independence
✅ Rejecting politically motivated attacks on the judiciary
✅ Affirming due process in legal decision-making
✅ Condemning misleading media narratives
Acting Secretary Tashya Gajanayake, in an official statement, clarified that the department had followed all standard legal procedures when issuing advice on January 27, 2025.
“The relevant officers carefully reviewed all available evidence before making recommendations to discharge the suspects. The Attorney General, after a thorough examination, agreed with these recommendations and proceeded accordingly,” the statement read.
Judicial Independence Over Political Influence
The Association strongly emphasized that decisions related to indictments or dismissals are made solely based on legal evidence, without political interference or concern for public approval or disapproval.
📌 “Taking decisions to file indictments or discharge suspects without bias is the hallmark of an independent Attorney General’s Department,” the statement affirmed.
The Association reaffirmed its full confidence in the Attorney General and the legal officers involved, noting that their professional integrity remains intact despite external pressures.
Furthermore, the Legal Officers’ Association issued a stern warning that it will vigorously oppose any attempts to undermine the Attorney General’s authority.
Leave A Comment